HAZID Study Service, Qatar

What is HAZID

A Hazard Identification (HAZID) study is a structured method used to identify possible hazards and evaluate the risks linked to a system or process. This proactive approach is usually conducted early in the design or operational stages of a project.

HAZID study has been developed specifically to reflect the importance of HSE issues on the fundamental decisions that are made at the inception of all development projects (e.g. design concept and location). HAZID is the first opportunity to collect experienced line and HSE staff together to address, in a short timeframe, the issues surrounding a new venture development or modification project.

When to Conduct a HAZID?

HAZID is typically one of the first formal HSE studies conducted for a new project, usually performed during the early design phase. The primary advantage of conducting a HAZID at this stage is the early detection of high-consequence hazards, providing crucial input for project development decisions before the design is finalized. This approach helps in adopting safer, more cost-effective design solutions with minimal change-related costs. HAZID is a versatile risk analysis tool that can be applied throughout the lifecycle of a plant, from the initial project phase to decommissioning. For instance, it is commonly used in the Management of Change processes when modifications, upgrades, or redesigns of existing facilities are made.

The HAZID Study technique includes the following

The image outlines the key components of the HAZID (Hazard Identification) Study technique in a structured manner. It features four main points, each highlighted within a shield-shaped icon for emphasis. The components include Early Hazard Identification, focusing on recognizing risks at the project's initiation; Diverse Team Brainstorming, emphasizing the collaboration of skilled individuals to evaluate hazards; Qualitative Risk Ranking, which involves assessing and prioritizing risks; and Focus on Recognition, aimed at identifying potential issues without immediate resolution. The headings are bold and organized for clarity, reinforcing the systematic approach of the HAZID study
Key Components of the HAZID Study Technique
  • The objective is to identify and describe health, safety, and environmental hazards and risks as soon as possible during initiating a project or undertaking.
  • A gathering of a proficient and diverse group of individuals utilizing a systematic brainstorming approach, founded on a comprehensive list of plausible health, safety, and environmental concerns, to evaluate the relevance of potential dangers.
  • Conduct a qualitative assessment of risks to rank the hazards.
  • Identifying and describing potential problems is conducted expeditiously, with the sole purpose of recognizing issues rather than attempting to resolve them.

Potential Impacts Assessed in a HAZID Study

  • The surroundings of the facilities.
  • The facilities in their surroundings.
  • The facilities on the health
  • Project Implementation Issues
  • HAZID study review identifies potentially dangerous and undesirable events that might affect a facility (equipment, operators, and production).
  • The review allows proper identification of HSE hazards at the beginning of a project and provides a detailed list of project hazards and recommended controls to manage those hazards to an acceptable level of risk
  • The review also describes the causes and consequences of these hazard scenarios and provides recommendations that propose:
    • Mitigation measures that will eliminate the risk of the occurrence of these events or limit their consequences
    • Investigations and studies to quantify the risks and possible consequences
  • The ultimate goal of the HAZID review is to identify potential hazards and manage the risk of those hazards to an acceptable level of risk.
  • The HAZID technique is designed to identify and mitigate risks associated with design decisions made in the early stages of the project.
  • By identifying these risks early in the design phase, the cost and schedule impact associated with the implementation of risk reduction measures is minimized.
  • The HAZID process involves the collaboration of seasoned line and HSE personnel to examine the concerns associated with a novel undertaking or alteration initiative.
  • HAZID was conducted according to the guidelines for HAZID to identify potential hazards through the application of guidewords so that impacts within the following categories could be assessed:
    • External and Environmental Hazards
    • Facility Hazards
    • Health Hazards
    • Project Implementation Issues

The HAZID technique includes the following:

  • The objective is to identify and describe health, safety, and environmental hazards and risks as early as possible in the development or implementation of a project
  • A group of experts from various disciplines convened to conduct a systematic brainstorming session utilizing a predetermined checklist of potential health, safety, and environmental concerns to evaluate the relevance of potential risks
  • Conduct a qualitative assessment of risks to rank the hazards

HAZID Analysis Execution Procedures

This image outlines the HAZID Analysis Execution Procedures, a systematic approach to identifying and mitigating hazards in engineering and industrial processes. It includes several key steps, each marked with a checkmark to indicate completion or importance. The steps are organized in two columns and include activities such as presenting the design overview, selecting the plant area, defining design intent, selecting hazard categories, applying guide words, identifying hazard causes, and assessing consequences and protections. Additional steps involve ranking hazard risks, providing recommendations, calculating residual risks, agreeing on cause credibility, and iteratively examining the next plant area, guideword, or hazard category. This visual serves as a checklist and framework for a thorough hazard identification and analysis process
HAZID Analysis Execution Procedures
  • The Process design team provided an overview of the design intent process operations and operating conditions of the facility
  • An appropriate section/area of the plant was selected
  • The design intent of the area and process conditions were defined
  • First/Next Hazard Category was selected
  • The first/Next guide word was applied, which when combined with the Hazard category will give the hazard scenario
  • All the potential causes of the hazard were determined (by brainstorming)
  • The credibility of each cause was agreed
  • The consequence of each cause was assessed; the protection and prevention provided against the causes and their consequences were assessed
  • Using a risk ranking matrix, each Hazard is then given a risk ranking for each of the four groups (People, Environment, Asset, & Reputation)
  • Additional recommendations were provided based on the requirement
  • The team then calculated residual risk for each of the four groups (People, Environment. Asset & Reputation)
  • The next guideword was applied (relevant to the selected Hazard Category)
  • The next Hazard Category was applied until they had all been considered
  • The next area of the plant/project was considered until the whole study area had been examined

During the HAZID workshop, Health, Safety, Environmental, and Reputation hazards were ranked as per the Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM).

The image depicts a Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM) used in safety and risk management to categorize the severity and likelihood of incidents. It consists of rows and columns that evaluate risks based on categories such as People, Assets/Production Losses, Environment, and Reputation. The severity of consequences is ranked from 0 (No Impact) to 5 (Massive Impact), with specific impacts like No Injury, Slight Damage, Major Injury, and Multiple Fatalities. Likelihood is divided into three levels: A (Never heard of in the industry), B (Has occurred in the industry), and C (Occurs several times in a year). Each cell, marked by combinations like 3B or 4C, represents a specific risk level, with colors highlighting low (purple), medium (yellow), and high (red) risks
RAM Matrix
  • This qualitative risk ranking assesses the likelihood and consequence of hazards to derive their significance.
  • The initial risk ranking was assigned assuming that no control/mitigation measures are in place.
  • For each risk that is ranked in the ALARP region, the team will consider and make a statement as to whether, based on the current understanding of the design, all practicable measures have been incorporated in the design, and hence that the risk as assessed is ALARP.
  • This statement will be used to support the argument that the overall design is ALARP.
  • This statement is not necessary or applicable for risks that are ranked in the intolerable or tolerable regions. If there are any risks in the intolerable region, these will need to be reviewed by the company and may be taken forward for further detailed evaluation.
  • The proceedings file of the HAZID is recorded and Risk treatment plan (recommendation/ action/ query items) is recorded and the corresponding HAZID Close Out Action Sheet (Appendix E) is generated for subsequent follow-up and close-out by the responsible action party.
  • It is accountable for the project team to track and close out all HAZID Study risk treatment plans/recommendations.
  • For those deviations that are considered by the HAZID study team to be credible, the following information was recorded in the HAZID worksheet.
  • Recommendations include design, operating, or maintenance changes that reduce or eliminate Deviations, Causes, and/or Consequences.
  • During the study, the team discussed all possible causes of each deviation from the design intent and listed them. Once all causes were documented, the team focused on the consequences for each identified cause.
  • The consequences documented were those that may credibly arise, given that the cause occurred.
  • Once the consequences were documented, the team reviewed the process design and operations for safeguards that would prevent, detect, or mitigate each cause/consequence scenario.
  • Any recommendations made are for additional safeguards that are not currently in use at the facility.
  • The purpose of the recommendations is to:
    • Reduce the probability of occurrence of an incident;
    • Reduce the severity of the consequences, in the event the incident was to occur;
    • Request further information, when the scenario could not be fully described owing to a lack of data or Request an update or addition of a particular document.
This image illustrates the HAZID Process, a structured framework for identifying and assessing potential hazards in industrial or engineering systems. The process begins with selecting the plant area or node, choosing a hazard category, and agreeing on the design intent. A guideword is then applied to evaluate whether a hazard is possible or likely. If a hazard is identified, brainstorming sessions are conducted to analyze associated risks and causes. The next step involves assessing prevention and protection measures, defining controls required for prevention, developing actions or recommendations, and prioritizing or ranking the risk. If no hazard is identified, the process loops back to reassess using the guideword. This flowchart visually represents the systematic approach of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks within a HAZID study.
The HAZID Study Process
  • The HAZID Study’s action items, also known as recommendations, are documented in the HAZID Report and subsequently monitored until resolution.
  • The primary aim of the HAZID session was to identify potential hazards, operability concerns, or integrity issues, without the intention of resolving any existing problems.
  • Therefore, the recommendations generated have been worded in a general manner using words like ‘Consider’, ‘Ensure’, and ‘Other action verbs’; It is imperative to acknowledge that the reactions to the HAZID recommendations must furnish an unambiguous record of the audit trail, encompassing the justifications for executing or abstaining from any measures.
  • “…Ensure…” Ensure is generally used as a reminder to include a particular point in documents, such as P&ID, Operating, Control & Shutdown Philosophy, and Cause and Effects, etc., which may not have been ready at the time of the HAZID.
  • In cases where the issuance of the document precedes the closeout of the Hazard Identification (HAZID) process, the response must include a detailed notation of the specific actions that have been taken.
  • If the issuance of the document is deferred until after the close-out of the Hazard Identification (HAZID) process, it is imperative that the response clearly outlines the method by which the point will be conveyed for subsequent implementation.
  • “…Review…” The process of identifying and describing potential problems is conducted expeditiously, with the sole purpose of highlighting the issues rather than attempting to resolve them. The response should outline the options considered and the conclusions reached, including justification for the action (including no action) taken.
  • “…Other action verbs…” Recommendations starting with other action verbs are mandatory actions that shall be implemented by the party responsible for closing out each recommendation.

Conclusion,

Conducting a Hazard Identification (HAZID) study is a critical step in the early stages of any project to identify and assess potential risks, ensuring the safety and efficiency of both the design and operation phases. By proactively identifying high-consequence hazards and addressing them early, organizations can make informed decisions that lead to safer, more cost-effective project outcomes. Whether applied to new projects, modifications, or operational changes, HAZID provides valuable insights that help mitigate risks and protect people, assets, and the environment throughout the lifecycle of a facility. Engaging in a thorough HAZID process ensures that safety remains a top priority, ultimately contributing to the success and sustainability of the project.